Lourdes condamnations de 19 jeunes accusés de reconstitution du « Parti de la Libération Islamique » !
Halte aux violences policières
Halte aux politiques de la mort
En novembre 2006, tawfik EL AMARI, jeune tunisien de 33 ans et père d’une fillette fut repêché mort dans un canal à Nantes, après avoir subi un contrôle d’identité par une brigade de policiers nantais. Mai 2008, Hakim AJIMI, un jeune d’origine tunisienne de 22 ans est décédé à GRASSE suite à une interpellation musclée effectuée par la BAC (Brigade Anti Criminalité) avec le soutien de la police municipale. Contrairement aux déclarations du préfet des Alpes-Maritimes Dominique VIAN, écartant l’implication des forces de l’ordre dans la mort du jeune homme, plusieurs témoins ont mis directement en cause la police dans son décès « il avait la face contre terre, trois policiers sur lui, j’ai entendu le jeune homme dire qu’il ne pouvait plus respirer, il était violet. Un des policiers lui a donné des coups de poing » selon un témoin. Les jeunes issus de l’immigration et des quartiers populaires sont les premières victimes des politiques répressives du gouvernement actuel. Les méthodes fortes et les discours érigés en étendard par le gouvernement contre les jeunes et les minorités éclaire d’une lumière crue les discours et les plans dits d’intégration. Très touchée par la mort de ce jeune homme, la FTCR présente ses sincères condoléances à la famille et aux proches de la victime. Elle exige toute la vérité sur la mort de Hakim. Elle s’engage également à soutenir le combat de la famille dans sa quête de la vérité. Paris le 12.05.08 Pour la FTCR Mohieddine CHERBIB
Cinquante migrants partis de Libye ont péri au large de la Tunisie
Tunisie Cinquante morts dans un drame de l’émigration clandestine
Lebanon Infighting & Hizbullah’s Image
IslamOnline.net has put the question to several leading Islamists and Arab intellectuals.
Mohammed Madi Akef, Muslim Brotherhood supreme leader
The Lebanese resistance’s image remains the same and any change would only be to its favor. They are the only party that defines what’s in the best interest of Lebanon as opposed to a Zionist-American scheme. Resistance is a legitimate right against the enemy.
Rashed Al-Ghannoushi, Head of Tunisian Islamic Renaissance Movement
The Lebanese resistance has always said that its weapons are only for confronting Israel. Though they have the right to self-defense, this does not give them the right to impose its authority and decisions on other national parties.
There is no doubt in mind that the image of Hizbullah in the Arab world and internationally has been affected.
We are still hopeful wisdom will prevail.
Tarik Al-Beshri, Egyptian Islamic Thinker
The Lebanese government’s decision to outlaw Hizbullah’s communication network targets only the infrastructure of a resistance group that has liberated Lebanon twice. This decision players into the hands of the Americans who want to support Israel.
The government tried to tarnish the resistance’s image but this will never happen unless in the case of a civil war.
The resistance group can not operate without a communication network because it is the backbone of their infrastructure.
Abdullah Bahaa, Head of the Moroccan Justice and Development Party Parliamentary Bloc
The events in Lebanon prove people did not take lessons from infighting in Palestine and Iraq. What usually happens is that you have one party representing the US project and policies that serve Israel and another that represents opposition to that scheme.
The Lebanese government’s decision fueled the fire. What was Hizbullah expected to do?
Nonetheless, the reaction was forceful and may affect Hizbullah’s image to some degree. It will have a similar image crisis like Hamas and the resistance in Iraq.
Mohammed Bulahya, Algerian Movement for National Reform Leader
Our view of Hizbullah has not changed. It is a resistance group fighting American-Zionist plots. Had it not been to Hizbullah’s resistance in 2006, Israel would have been able to conquer Lebanon.
We support Hizbullah’s decision not to give up its weapons because they are only directed at the Israeli enemy.
We believe that is happening in Lebanon is an Israeli-American war carried out by Arab and Muslim hands.
It’s a concocted conflict triggered by Israel and the US but regrettably implemented by Arab and Muslim parties.
Fateh Rabie, Algerian Islamic Renaissance Movement leader
Hizbullah still represents the Lebanese resistance in the face of the American-Zionist project in the region.
So far Hizbullah has dodged attempts to embroil it in a sectarian strive and has braved all provocations despite having the military capacity to take over the entire country.
We hope the resistance’s weapons would remain locked on the Zionist enemy and the leadership of Hizbullah would live up to the expectations of the Arab people.
Sediq Shehab, Algerian Parliament Deputy Speaker
The crisis in Lebanon is an example of a broader inter-Arab conflict between proponents and opponents of normalization with the Zionist entity.
The latest developments are an attempt to bring opponents of the Zionist entity and American hegemony to their knees.
The responsibility for what is happening lies squarely with known Arab and Muslim parties and Hizbullah.
Despite its heroic resistance to Israel and US hegemony, Hizbullah bears a considerable part of the responsibility for the ongoing crisis which does not serve its image in the Arab street.
Mohammed Al Rada Khaldun, Moroccan Thinker
What Hizbullah did was shocking.
Hizbullah’s image will be negatively affected and this crisis would only serve American allegations linking Islamists and resistance to terrorism.
(Source: IslamOnline Sun. May. 11, 2008)